needle & thREAD

DSC_2281

DSC_2291

DSC_2295

DSC_2299

DSC_2306

I finally finished those dresses! Details, details:

The fabric is Zoe Pearn's Sweet Nothings. It appears to be very sold out. I bought a whole bunch of it for curtains and then decided otherwise. Happy thing, that.

The pattern is Oliver + S Seashore Sundress in a 3, 5, and 12. 

I'm reading Stratford Caldecott's Beauty in the World: Rethinking the Foundations of Education. It's my inspiration before heading into mega planning mode for the coming year. It's an awesome summer read whether you educate your children at home or not. We all need this book.

I'll be back within the week with a review and a giveaway.

What about you? Sewing? Reading? A little of both? What's on your summer reading list? Do you have a summer sewing list?  Or are you embroidering? Pulling a needle with thread through lovely fabric to make life more beautiful somehow? Would you share with us just a single photo (or more) and a brief description of what you're up to? Will you tell us about what you're reading, also? Would you talk sewing and books with us? I'd love that so much.

Make sure the link you submit is to the URL of your blog post or your specific Flickr photo and not your main blog URL or Flickr Photostream. Please be sure and link to your current needle and thREAD post below in the comments, and not a needle and thREAD post from a previous week. If you don't have a blog, please post a photo to the needle & thREAD group at Flickr
       Include a link back to this post in your blog post or on your flickr photo page so that others who may want to join the needle and thREAD fun can find us! Feel free to grab a button here (in one of several colors) so that you can use the button to link:-).

 

NFP: Open to the Possibility of Life

This my third installation of NFP Throwback in honor of NFP Awareness Week. For the full introduction, please read here. For the second installation, read here.

One quick note: I'm mostly offline this week. I so appreciate your comments and I've been praying for commenters on the last two posts. I promise I'm not ignoring you! I'll be back to reflect and to talk a bit in the comment box towards the end of the week.

Without further ado, here's a column from Summer 1993. My current editorializing is in pink:

With my husband's blessing, I would like to share our personal story of what embracing the Church's teaching on human life has meant in our lives. When Mike and I were married six years ago, we understood Humanae Vitae to mean an openness to the possiblity of life. That was what we wanted and we neither sought to prevent conception or pursue it. A year later, our first son was born. When I held Michael, I was awed by him as most mothers are by their newborns, but I didn't yet grasp how precious life is. It had all been too easy.

For the next eighteen months, we struggled in our roles as newlyweds and new parents. Then we discovered I had cancer. Suddenly, the child we had taken for granted took on a whole new dimension. He was joy on dark days and diversion on painful ones. Some days, he was my soul reason for living. I had nutured and comforted him for the first year of his life and he returned the comfort a hundredfold during the next. It became very apparent that God had had a plan when He blessed us with this child so early in our marriage and I was grateful we'd been open to his creation.

Since my disease had a good prognosis, it was not my life I feared [that actually came later as I learned what it is to live forever in the shadow of cancer], but my ablity to bear life. In horror and disbelief, a few days after diagnosis, Mike and I sat across from an oncologist who told us I would never again carry a baby to term because of chemotherapy. Then, we found another doctor. We chose someone who understood that I not only wanted to survive, but that I desperately wanted to have more babies. He was much more optimistic and considered my fertility when prescribing treatment. 

After undergoing chemotherapy and radiation, it was imperative that I give my body sufficient time to recover before becoming pregnant again. I also needed to know that the cancer would not recur [realistically, we never have that guarantee]. The medical community encouraged us to use artificial birth control, but my husband and I were being called in another direction.

We talked with the Couple to Couple League in Cincinnati, Ohio and they referred us to an oncologist in Massachusetts who was on the CCL advisory board. Together, Mike and I learned how to properly practice NFP. Both my doctor and the oncologist from CCL warned that it could be some time before we saw any signs of fertility returning after treatment. The benefit of NFP was that I would know as my body returned to normal.

The next seven months were the most anxious of my entire life [in hindsight, 21 years later, I can safely say that period still ranks in the Top 5 Most Anxious Times]. I watched and waited for signs that the cancer had recurred. I watched and waited for signs of fertility. I prayed for life: mine and that of our future children. And I prayed for peace.

As soon as I knew it was possible to conceive, I asked my doctor if it were advisable. He gave me cautious approval, warning me that he thought it might take a while to conceive. Because of NFP, I knew the signs of fertility and I knew I could get pregnant. [This still makes me giggle. My oncologist was as close to the perfect doctor I've ever met. He was impeccably educated and utterly brilliant. But on that day, I was sure I knew better than he did.

There was a lot I didn't know though. I didn't know if the cancer would recur. I didn't know if I could carry to term. And I didn't know what God wanted. I was terrified. I agonized over the wisdom of bringing another life into my world where there were so few guarantees. Ultimately, I trusted Mike with the decision. And his reasoning was simple: All God asks is that we are open to the possiblity. He cannot work if we don't let Him. Two weeks later, I called my doctor to let him know I was expecting a baby. 

Despite the ease with which this baby was conceived, I was still not at peace. Everything we had learned about discernment said that if we were truly doing God's will, we would feel His peace. I suppose if I had been genuinely faith-filled, I would have simply been patient and trusted the Lord. But I asked for big signs. At one point, I begged God to send an angel to tell me everything was going to be okay.

Our second son, Matthew Christian, was born nearly three weeks after my due date (so much for not carrying to term). The hospital was unusually quiet that night and his birth was remarkably quick. Indescribable peace settled upon us. As I marvelled at his newborn sweetness, I found myself praying aloud. "He's beautiful, Lord. Not an angel but a real, live boy to live with us and remind us always of the infinite wisdom of Your plan in our lives. When I look at him I can't believe he's anything but Your perfect will for us. You didn't send an angel, but You did send a sign--a priceless gift--didn't You?"

And the baby smiled. 

Miracle

Photo-76

That was just the beginning. We learned well to trust. We learned that God's grace and strength had no bounds. He would offer a refresher course through the years. I shared a bit of the miracle of Patrick here. And Sarah's story--in addition to being a refresher course in grace for Mike and me--granted my older children a phenomenal view of how boundless God's good plan can be. There are more stories, not yet told here. I assure you, with every single baby, I was sure I couldn't do it. From the first (so soon and we were so young), to the last (they were so many and we were so old), each time I was sure I was not sufficient. And each time, I am certain, we could have made a good case for having a grave or serious reason not to have another.  Each time, God knew better.

Prayerful Sex

Photo-75

This my second installation of NFP Throwback in honor of NFP Awareness Week. For the full introduction, please read here.

Without further ado, here's a column from Summer 1993. My current editorializing is in pink:

I recently asked a young man who is about to be married what advice he had received concerning marriage. He looked me straight in the eye and said, "The only advice my mother has given me is that no marriage can have too much of two things: sex and prayer." As I  recall, I turned very red and quickly inquired about china patterns. But the words have stuck with me. Now I wish I could sit with his mother and discover what other pearls of wisdom she has to offer. 

Because I know this young man, I know his mother was referring to unselfish marital sex. It is wholly appropriate to discuss lovemaking and prayer in the same context. That is how God intended it. Married love should embrace the Lord, creator of life. The unitive nature of making love and the procreative nature are inextricably intertwined. To deny either one is to deny God, who invested sex with that quality. In order to know God's will regarding the conception of children, the couple must pray together. It is that constant communication, with each other and with God that makes Natural Family Planning (NFP) so good for marriages.

In my last post, I shared the myriad of options the medical community makes available to couples who are planning their families. And we discovered what a euphemism "options" is. Rather than arbitrary, heavy-handed rules, the Church's stand on birth control is a protective measure, which shields couples from the evil inherent in all forms of artificial birth control and encourages them to consider God's will in every aspect of their lives.

NFP is not the rhythm method. It does not solely rely on a "safe time of the month." Instead, it is a scientific method in which married and engaged couples note, chart, and interpret the woman's fertility signs. The couple considers the time of the month, basal body temperature, cervical mucous, and physical attributes of the cervix itself. When used properly,it is every bit as effective as the pill.

It is not my intention to tell couples how to use NFP, but to tell them why NFP makes so much more sense than artificial birth control. Many couples decide on a form of contraception and then rarely discuss sex in terms of children. I wonder how many women, before they take their pills every morning, consider what God's plan is for their families. I wonder how many men ever think about the pill at all, even when their wives take it daily. Contraception becomes a routine part of day-today life-- a mechanization requiring little thought and no communication.

NFP enhances communciation between spouses. It is a shared responsibility. Most importantly, this cooperative effort embraces God. An NFP couple must not only discuss sex, but to use NFP properly, they must pray about it. It is a blessing to a marriage when God is included in the  sacred act He created. NFP requires prayerful consideration. It does seem that couples using NFP have more children than other couples. None of those children are "accidents." These couples have prayerfully considered life more often and are more open to divine intervention in the family planning. Above all, marriage partners who are open to God's plan know the peace of cooperation with the love of the Creator.

Marriage is hard work. I won't deny that NFP is work, too. I don't know of anything of value in interpersonal relationships that doesn't require some effort. NFP requires faithfulness. It requires some sacrifice, a dying to self. But that is what love is all about--giving for the good of another. That is not a bad thing. When they are choosing abstinence, couples experience a time of "courtship." They are challenged to find alternate expressions of love and they experiences the joys inherent to those expressions.

Finally, NFP is wonderful witness to children. When my children are adolescents and I want to impress upon them the merits of chastity, I will speak from a personal perspective, telling them about the sanctity of sex within a marriage, about sacrifice, and fidelity. I'll urge them to prayerfully consider God's will and His plan for their lives. Iwill be able to empathize with how difficult it is to deny the urgings of the flesh because I will be living a chaste life. [Note: Now that my children are of this age, I recognize the huge role a community of faith plays. When you are surrounded by supportive friends, this lifestyle is more readily embraced than when you are all alone in the culture. Whether married or single, living sexuality as God intended requires open communication and a shared of philosophy within the couple and, ideally, surrounding the couple. Cultivating that community is infinitely valuable.] I will tell them that I know what it feels like to be in love and to gratefully accept God's blessings upon a union. And when they are about to be married, I will tell them that a good marriage can never have too much of two things: sex and prayer.

NFP: 19 years later

Photo-72

It's NFP Awareness week. This year, there's a bold, fresh website on the scene to take on the challenge of introducing Natural Family Planning to a new, decidedly digital generation. There's a great new collection of articles there that I'm sure will enlighten most everyone. And there's more: iusenfp.com is another new site--this one run by two young women--designed to promote the value of natural family planning. 

I heartily applaud the efforts of these young people (and I feel a bit like my grandmother calling them "these young people."). As I read them, I remember being young and married and not at all a part of the contraceptive culture. While I think these sites do run a calculated risk of sounding a bit like "The Natural Approach to Contraception," I think the good outweighs the potential for misinterpretation. They're definitely getting good information out there, information that is not readily available on the maintstream information superhighway. Over the years, I've grown to appreciate the spiritual aspects above all the rest. Openness to life is the ultimate self-improvement --God-improvement-- program. Hopefully, that, too, will come from these young writers.

My early NFP days predate said superhighway. I learned about NFP mostly from another young teacher who was also a newlywed at the first school where I taught. I had heard of it during an Engaged Encounter just before the school year began (we were married the first week of school), and Betsy followed up with her own experience. She was open and frank, but not nearly as frank as what's floating out there now. From there, I did some reading on my own and we took a Couple-to-Couple League class. 

We had decided on that Engaged Encounter not to contracept. And, frankly, we were pretty much open to whatever God had in mind. We welcomed our first baby just after our first anniversary. And I would do it exactly that way in heartbeat, if I had it to do again. It wasn't really until after that baby, and after cancer, that we started to understand the theology behind NFP. Our early marriage story is pretty different from most, but it's dear to us. 

Anyway, that's a rather longer introduction than I planned. All that to say, I figured that since I'm old enough to call the 1flesh.org folk "these young people," I should probably go back and dig up my own words before I share what I thought about NFP back in the beginning. I have three artcles from exactly 19 years ago today to share over the next three days. These were originally published in the Arlington Catholic Herald on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the very prophetic Humanae Vitae. I'm going to try to refrain from editorializing too much. The articles are just as I wrote them, with my comments today in pink.

Here we go:

There are table tents set up all around the waiting room of the OB/GYN office where I teach childbirth classes. "Ask about your birth control options," they scream from every corner of the room. Ask indeed. I wonder what I would be told.

Would I be told that the pill is an abortifacient? I don't think so. Rare is the doctor who sit down with a patient and discusses the fine print. Most couples know that the pill often prevents pregnancy by suppressing ovulation and altering the cervical mucus. But how many people understand the ultimate "back up"? When a baby is conceived, he is aborted without his mother's knowledge because hormones have rendered the uterus inhospitable to life. Some option! Before a woman could even consider her choices, the hormone in the pill she takes so routinely can abort her baby. All hormonal contraceptives work in a similar manner.

Norplant, new and trendy though it appears, is merely a steady stream of hormones for five years. A woman will never have to give birth control a second thought. But will she think about what those hormones are doing to the natural chemsitry of her body?  [Note: Norplant was discontinued in the United States about ten years after it was introduced. Hmmm]. 

Depo-Provera, a recently introduced injectable hormone contraception, provides up to three months protection against pregnancy, while remaining in the body and preventing the resumption of a normal cycle for up to eighteen month. Of course, once it has been injected the woman is stuck with it. Once they give her the shot, she can't take it out--for better or worse, no matter what the "side effects." ["Side effects" is a joke term. All efects of a drug are just that, effects. They may not be what you signed up for, but they are effects. Incidentally, Depo-Provera is Melinda Gates' drug of choice. You can read more on that here.]

Let's consider the side effects. "Side effects" are what the pharmaceutical companies call the unpleasant effects of drugs. They all listed in a rather lengthy insert included with every prescription of hormonal contraceptives. A woman may not experience every effect of the drug. But the list--which includes risk of blood clots, heart attack and strokes, gallbladder disease, liver tumors, headache, nervousness, depression and hair loss--is pretty scary reading material. Most couples never even glance at the insert. 

Then there are the other "options" which society and the medical community present to us. Another abortifacient, the IUD, works to prevent an embryo [a real live baby] from implanting in his mother's uterus. Instant abortion. Barrier methods, especially the condom which the popular press holds in such high esteem, prevent the very physical intimacy that lovemaking seeks and deny the unitive as well as the procreative nature of intercourse. And as far as spontaneity and romance go, I don't think it's spontaneous or romantic to go to bed with barriers between us.

When the couples in my classes ask me about birth control and I mention NFP, I amost always get the "you-must-be-an-extremist-hope-to-have-ten-kids" look [I was 27, with two children, when I wrote this. I am well aware that this line is amusing now. In a very, very good way.] I've often heard that the Catholic Church is unrealistic, rigid, and chauvinistic in its approach to contraception. I disagree.

When my husband and I really looked at the "options," when we took the time to educate ourselves about what was being professed by the secular society versus what the Church taught, we found that the Church was not only reasonable, but very supportive of marital sex. Far from being evil, in a Christian marriage, sex is a high and noble thing--a gift from God. The Church approves of lovemaking, even if for serious reasons the couple isn't trying to achieve pregnancy. The Church's stand on birth control seeks not to make life difficult by to help married couples make a good thing even better. Sex is holy; it is God's idea. And openness to children is an integral part of God's plan. 

Artificial birth control isn't good for women. And it isn't good for marriages. It deprives couples the third party in their union. God. When sex denies life, it denies Life. That is, it excludes the Creator of Life. once He is exclueded, one third of the mrriage covenant participants has been asked to leave--the wisest one. In my nex tpost, we'll consider Natural Family Planning, a way to plan families that embraces God.

[Am I a bad witness for NFP because I have nine children? I don't think so. I don't think so at all. I think there is a danger to think that good or successful use of NFP guarantees that your family makeup will look just like that of pharmaceutical family planners. If so, then clearly you have excellent scientific charting skills and applaudable self-control. I've even seen blogs where couples have practiced for years and never knew these few lines existed in the Church's teaching: With regard to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions, responsible parenthood is exercised by those who prudently and generously decide to have more children, and by those who, for serious reasons and with due respect to moral precepts, decide not to have additional children for either a certain or an indefinite period of time.  

We learned quickly that we couldn't out-give God. His generosity--of adequate wealth, but more importantly of grace and strength--was sufficient. Always. For us, NFP was there, an underpinning of an awareness of fertility and hormonal cycles. Every one of those nine children was welcomed enthusiastically. We knew there would be challenges. And we trusted He would equip and bless. He always has.]